When I first bought Adobe Innovative Suite 4, Internet Advanced, included was Adobe Link CS4. Based on Adobe, the product Connection is "strong, easy-to-use press manager for visible persons, letting you easily organize, surf, locate and see innovative assets." (source: Adobe internet site) Therefore I began to use Link to prepare my (then) hundreds of photos.
Then I scanned in 1000s of images within my movie library from ten years of shooting sheets of 35mm film. I began stalling in Connection, I could perhaps not keep track of wherever every thing was. I was losing the work-flow battle. Then I learned about Photoshop Lightroom 2. Yet again, based on Adobe "...Lightroom 2 is needed for the electronic images work-flow needed now. Today a photographer can easily import, method, manage, and highlight your images--from one picture to a whole shoot." Lightroom however, was an additional cost stand alone plan that cost around $250 list.
Properly, I see the advertisements and the reviews and quickly chose to join the Lightroom bandwagon. The problem is, do you really need Lightroom? In my own brain Lightroom 2 is supposed to be an integral, but stand alone request for the critical photographer. With Lightroom you are able to manage your photographs with catalogs and libraries in a more successful manner for big amounts of images.
If you should be shooting in RAW format equally Bridge and Lightroom have the same RAW controls. Only a little know truth is that the "Develop" element in Lightroom is identical to the RAW formatting controls in Bridge. Lightroom's "Develop" module takes different photo manipulation much further than Bridge. While not as effective as Photoshop, I discover that a lot of of my picture editing has become done in Lightroom and I take advantage of Photoshop limited to the truly major lifting. Sometimes make use of Lightroom rather than Photoshop or you might actually make do with Photoshop Components or number other photo editing software.how to get lightroom for free
With Adobe Connection you are able to coordinate your pictures, you can draw (keyword)the photographs and videos. And Link may study and write RAW files. With Lightroom 2 you can arrange your photographs, keyword them, and you can transfer from many different forms and write back out in multiple formats. Lightroom is fragile in the area of videos. It's stronger in their capability to "build" or to change and change a photograph. It edits in a non-destructive way that retains the initial format. Lightroom was created to complement the work-flow of a critical shooter that will have hundreds or tens of thousands of pictures to method or alter, actually when it is for a simple plant and structure to a printing size.
Therefore, the bottom point is that I would suggest Bridge for an individual that has some of the Adobe suite of products and needs a decrease level of image organization. I would recommend Lightroom 2 for the intentional shooter, those that shoot thousands as well as 1000s of photographs and needs to prepare, modify, print and showcase their products.